What is the story of the anger of the Ministry of Guidance representatives with Satra?

What is the story of the anger of the Ministry of Guidance representatives with Satra?

For some time now, the story of making the reality show “Oscar” has been in the news on one of the home viewing platforms. A wave of rumors followed by confirmations and denials about this news has started and it has become one of the news about which various sides are discussed.

At the beginning of October, it was announced that the Oscar program is going to be made and broadcast with the performance of Mehran Moderi. This reality show has received the production license from Satra and the production of parts of it has also started. However, after the release of this news, there were reports of obstruction to the production and broadcast of the show.

Some media wrote that Mehran Moderi, who was recently the host of the “Dourhami” program of Sed and Cima, still has a commitment, and despite this commitment, Sed and Cima does not allow a manager to appear in a program belonging to the home show network.

A few days later, this matter was denied by the producer of the Durhami program. Nasser Qadeerkashani announced that a manager has no obligation to produce a program for the Broadcasting Organization; He also denied the story of Mehran Moderi’s financial debt to Sed and Sima and related the details of Moderi to the release of a personal video of him last year.

Whatever was the main reason for the differences between Sed and Cima and Mehran Modiri, now the release of the Oscar program has been suspended and has become the main obstacle to the broadcast of this program. Satra, as the regulatory and licensing authority for home viewing platforms, which is affiliated and supervised by Broadcasting, has not issued a license to broadcast the Oscars as requested by the organization.

The news published in the last few weeks indicated that the story of Madiri’s commitment to Radio and Television is still on the agenda, and this organization has ordered Satra not to give Mehran Madiri permission to do any activities in the home show network. With this account, it seems that until the new season of Durami program is made for TV, a manager will not be allowed to participate in home show projects.

This difference has continued until today and has even caused differences between institutions. Insaf News quoted one of Satra’s managers as writing by the head of the Broadcasting Organization that Mehran Madiri wants to cooperate with the TV and as a result Satra cannot announce the news of issuing a license and broadcasting this program for the time being.

He further informed that the same dispute was objected by representatives of the Ministry of Guidance who are members of Satra. These representatives protested against this unprofessional and illegal treatment and arbitrary supervision by the managers of Satra for a month, and they have not even agreed to participate in the production and broadcast licensing meetings that are held in Satra.

Although the conflict between Satra and home viewing platforms has occurred in other forms in recent times and has caused various disputes, in all these cases, the reason for the difference is the desire of Sada and Sima and, as a result, Satra to continue Sada and Sima’s monopoly in the field of production. And it has been broadcasting programs and series.

As a long-standing actor in the field of producing and broadcasting audio and video content, Sedavasima saw itself in danger with the emergence of its fresh and online competitors, i.e. ubiquitous audio and video broadcasting platforms (or VODs), and in order to turn the field into a competitor. He tried hard not to let go.

Of course, these efforts were more than spent on improving and improving the quality of television productions, they were spent on forming a supervisory body for VODs so that it is responsible for monitoring, issuing licenses and making decisions of its own subordinate body. This goal was achieved with the formation of Satra, and legislation and supervision by an institution related to radio and television, which itself has interests in the production and distribution of audio and video content and is a competitor of VODs, was opposed by the activists of the home television network from the very beginning.

Of course, those objections and protests never went anywhere, and the regulatory organization for the regulation of ubiquitous audio and video media in the virtual space continued to work. Despite this, the predictions proved to be correct and the activities of Satra and his subordinates from time to time became troublesome for the home networks. The desire to monopolize some figures and artists is the new form of Satra and Sedavasima’s efforts to maintain their dominance in the field of production, production and broadcasting of audio and visual works, which this time has also caused protests by the government representatives.

Source link


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *