80 million slaves; There are whispers of artificial intelligence localization
Describing the frightening abilities of artificial intelligence and ChatGPT, Mr. Padenan says that in the not-so-distant future, 80 million Iranians will become 80 million slaves who will do whatever the artificial intelligence asks them to do.
AI users are not “slaves” to this technology by any measure.
Let’s ask ourselves a simple question: Why do we use services like ChatGPT? Why did the OpenAI news chatbot reach more than one hundred million users in a short time? ChatGPT relies on today’s technologies to help us humans do things better. ChatGPT reduces the time to write code, helps journalist me choose better headlines and sentences, and gives some help to those who are looking to travel. These are just a small part of ChatGPT’s capabilities.
We don’t use ChatGPT to enslave you; ChatGPT is a helpful assistant for us and appears in the role of complementing our work.
Referring to the phrase 80 million slaves does not surprise us. For years, we have become accustomed to limiting services for reasons that do not make much sense.
Nowhere in the world has a special law been formulated to deal with artificial intelligence, but it seems that our officials are already looking for various excuses to declare artificial intelligence illegal whenever they want.
Mr. Padenan indirectly said that the US is trying to enslave 80 million Iranians through ChatGPT, and for this reason access to this technology should be prevented.
Technology-based services have made our lives simpler and more productive. If technology didn’t exist, today we wouldn’t have a phone, we wouldn’t have the internet, and we wouldn’t be able to access the information we want at any time.
If there was no technology, life and therefore our mentality and line of thought would be limited to our location. If it were not for technology, many Iranian companies would not exist today. If it wasn’t for technology, there wouldn’t be profitable and successful startups like Snap.
We are used to seeing the glass as half empty. We do not see all the benefits that technology brings to people and the country and we always seek to limit it.
The sentences that were said in the recent meeting have the status of a foreshock, a foreshock of a serious confrontation with the latest technologies that can be useful even for us Iranians and make our work faster and more productive.
Why do we resist learning?